Allen Latta's Thoughts on Private Equity, Etc.
  • Allen's Blog
  • Blog Post Categories
  • Glossary of Private Equity Terms
  • Resources
  • About
  • Contact

LP Corner: Fund Performance Metrics – Multiples TVPI, DPI and RVPI

2/3/2018

9 Comments

 
This one of a series of posts on fund performance metrics.  Other posts in this series include:
  • LP Corner: Private Equity Fund Performance – An Overview
  • LP Corner: Fund Performance Metrics – Multiples TVPI, DPI and RVPI - this blog post.
  • LP Corner: Fund Performance Metrics – Internal Rate of Return (IRR) – Part One
  • LP Corner: Fund Performance Metrics – Internal Rate of Return (IRR) – Part Two
  • LP Corner: Fund Performance Metrics – Public Market Equivalent (PME)
  • LP Corner: Fund Performance Metrics - Private Equity Fund Performance
  • LP Corner: Gross vs Net Returns

In this post, we will explore using multiples as a tool to evaluate fund performance.
 
The multiples are:
  • Distributions to Paid-in-Capital, or DPI
  • Residual Value to Paid-in-Capital, or RVPI
  • Total Value to Paid-in-Capital, or TVPI
 
Here’s some important terminology that will help explain the multiples:
  • Paid-in-Capital = the capital contributed by LPs to the fund.  Paid-in-capital is also known as “contributed capital” or “called capital” or sometimes “drawn capital.”  Note that Paid-in-Capital is different than Committed Capital.  Recall that an investment in a private equity fund occurs over time.  An investor in the fund, known as a limited partner or LP, agrees (commits) to invest a certain amount in a fund, say $10 million, as and when the manager of the fund, known as a general partner or GP, needs the capital.  In this case, the $10 million is the LP’s commitment.  As the GP asks for a portion of this commitment (known as a “call”), the amount paid by the LP to the fund is known as Paid-in-Capital, or PIC (this is also known as “called capital”).
  • Distributions = the value of the cash and stock that the fund has given back (distributed) to the LPs.  Distributions are typically low early in a fund’s life, ramping up over time as investments are exited.
  • Residual Value = the remaining value of the fund at a given point in time.  Residual value is the value of the fund’s investments plus other fund assets (cash, etc.) less fund liabilities.  So, for example, if the fund has 12 remaining investments with an aggregate estimated fair value of $100 million and another $3 million in cash, the Residual Value of the Fund is $103 million.  Early in a fund’s life when investments are being made residual value is typically high (reflecting the value of the investments) and declines over time as the fund exits its investments and makes distributions to the LPs.
  • Total Value = the total value of the fund, which is the sum of the distributions and the residual (remaining) value of the fund at a given point in time.  The mathematical relationship among these metrics is:
Picture

​​​To better understand the above terminology, let’s look at the terms graphically:
​
Picture
To read more, please click "Read More" to the right below.
 
Start at the top of the graphic, with the LPs.  The LPs invest (contribute) cash into the fund over time.  The amount contributed by LPs in the fund through a particular date is known as Paid-in-Capital.  The graphic shows PIC in red as it is a cash outflow for LPs.  (For a discussion of committed capital vs paid-in-capital, please see my blog post “LP Corner: On Committed Capital, Called Capital and Uncalled Capital.”)  The fund uses the Paid-in-Capital to invest in portfolio companies, and to pay management fee and fund expenses.  As the fund exits its investments (the portfolio company is sold, is recapitalized or goes public) the fund will return cash and stock to the LPs.  This return of cash and stock to LPs is known as Distributions.  Distributions are shown in the graphic above in green, meaning they are cash inflows to LPs.  The value remaining in the fund (primarily the value of the fund’s investments) is known as Residual Value.  Residual Value is also shown in green in the above graphic, as over time this will become distributions to the LPs.
 
An Important Note: These are NET returns.  In this discussion of multiples, we are discussing net multiples, meaning performance net of management fee, expenses and carried interest.  Stated another way, these multiples are based on returns to the LP.  Please see my prior post “LP Corner: Private Equity Fund Performance – An Overview” for a discussion of gross vs net returns.
 
Now, on to the multiples:
 
DPI (Distributions to Paid-in-Capital).  Distributions to Paid-in-Capital is the ratio of Distributions to Paid-in-Capital, and that value is expressed as a multiple, such as 0.5, 1.2, 2.0, etc., but also expressed as 0.5x, 1.2x, 2.0x, etc.  The DPI equation is as follows: 
Picture
To me, DPI is a critical evaluation tool.  The higher DPI, the better.  A DPI of 1.0x means that the fund has returned to LPs an amount equal to their Paid-in-Capital.  A DPI of 3.0x means the fund has returned to LPs an amount equal to 3.0x their Paid-in-Capital.  A 3.0x DPI for a fund is a good result.

RVPI (Residual Value to Paid-in-Capital).  Residual Value to Paid-in-Capital is the ratio of Residual Value (the remaining value of the fund) to Paid-in-Capital, which is also expressed as a multiple, such as 1.0 or 1.0x.  The RVPI equation is as follows:
Picture
​TVPI (Total Value to Paid-in-Capital).  Total Value to Paid-in-Capital is the ratio of Total Value to Paid-in-Capital, also expressed as a multiple, such as 1.0x or 2.0x.  The equation is as follows:
Picture
​Recall that Total Value is the sum of Distributions and Residual Value.  Thus, the above equation can also be expressed as:
Picture

​Pros and Cons of Using Multiples to Evaluate Fund Performance
Multiples are a common method used to evaluate the performance of a fund.
The main pros are:
  • Multiples are widely used.
  • Multiples are easy to calculate.
The main cons are:
  • Multiples don’t take into account the time value of money.  So, for example, a 2x TVPI multiple may be a good result if the fund life is 7 years, but may not be a good result if the fund life is 15 years.
  • Until the fund is liquidated, multiples are indications of interim performance.  The final results for a fund won’t be known until the fund is liquidated – usually after year 12, but sometimes much later, and so it is important to remember that if the fund is still active, the performance multiples are interim, not final.
  • Residual value is largely based on estimates of the value of the remaining portfolio investments.  If Residual Value makes up most of Total Value (meaning there haven’t been many Distributions), then estimates of portfolio company investments drive the Total Value.  The problem here is that Residual Value is subject to changing valuations as the companies mature.  If the fund values an investment at $10 million at a particular point in time, but the company is sold and the fund only receives $2 million, then the Residual Value was overstated by $8 million.  Conversely, if that investment is sold and the fund receives $20 million, then the Residual Value was understated by $10 million.  Estimating values for portfolio company investments is more art than science, and so is subject to wide variability.
 
Simple Example
Let’s say that as of the end a particular quarter, a fund has called $50 million of capital (PIC = $50), has distributed $60 million to LPs (D = $60), and has a residual value of $70 million (RV = $70).  Total value (TV) is calculated with the following equation: TV = RV + D, so Total Value here is $130 million ($70 RV + $60 D). With this information, we can calculate the multiples:
  • TVPI is 2.6x ($130 TV / $50 PIC)
  • DPI is 1.2x ($60 D / $50 PIC)
  • RVPI is 1.4x ($70 RV / $50 PIC).  This can also be calculated by using the formula TVPI = DPI + RVPI, so solving for RVPI = TVPI – DPI, which leads to RVPI = 1.4x (2.6 TVPI – 1.2x DPI).
A couple of observations.  First, if DPI is greater than one, the fund has returned to the LPs all of their paid in capital.  With a DPI of 1.2x, this means that LPs have received back all of their Paid-in-Capital, and have received 20% above that.  Second, the RVPI of 1.4x means that there is still a lot of value in this fund.  However, we don’t know where the fund is in its fund term (is it in year 3 or 13?), and if the fund is early in its life, the RVPI may fluctuate.  Finally, TVPI of 2.6 is in absolute terms a pretty good result if that’s the final number.
 
​
Detailed Example:  AdVenture Capital Fund 3, L.P.
This is an early-stage venture capital fund that has committed capital of $100 million.  Committed capital is the total amount of capital that LPs have agreed (committed) to provide to the fund over the life of the fund.  In private equity, funds “call” capital over the life of the fund, with the bulk of the capital called during the investment term of the fund.  This fund has a 10-year term, plus two 1-year extensions at the option of the general partner of the fund.  The investment period for the fund is the first five years.
 
Paid-in-Capital (aka Called Capital)
Here’s what the capital calls look like over the 12-year life of the fund.
Picture
​Here’s what this looks like graphically:
Picture
​As the chart on the left indicates, most of the capital is called during the early years of the fund’s life, when it is making new investments.  The chart on the right shows the cumulative paid-in-capital over time.
 
Distributions
Funds typically make distributions to the LPs after it has exited an investment or two.  For this venture capital fund, once it makes an investment in a company, the fund will continue to hold that investment until the company is sold or goes public.  This “holding period” is typically three to seven years, but can be as short as 6 months or as long as 15 years or more.  This fund follows a more common path – no distributions for the first couple of years, and then a growing amount of distributions during the “harvest phase”, declining as the fund sells its remaining investments.
Picture
​The annual distribution chart on the left shows that the annual distributions grow for a period of time and then decline as the fund nears the end of its term.
 
Residual Value
Residual value is the value of a fund at a given point in time.  Residual value will change over time as the fund calls capital, the fund makes investments, investment valuations change, investments are exited and distributions are made to the LPs.  Residual value is reported quarterly to LPs by the fund, and is called net asset value, or fund value in the financial statements.
 
For Adventure Capital Fund 3, L.P., the residual value at the end of each year is as follows:
Picture
Total Value
Total value is the fund’s total value at a given point in time, and is the sum of distributions and residual value.  Recall Total Value = Distributions + Residual Value.  
Picture
​Multiples
Now let’s calculate the multiples for this fund.
Picture
​Let’s focus first on TVPI (aka TV/PIC).
Picture
​Note that in year 1, TVPI is 0.87x.  This means that the total value of the LPs investment is 87% of what the LP has paid-in as capital.  So, this means the LP has a loss on its investment.  Year 2 is even worse, and then it begins to rebound in year 3, and is greater than 1 in year 4.  Why is this?  This is known as the J-Curve, and it is explained in detail in my blog post “LP Corner: The J-Curve.”.  At around year 7, the value seems to level off.  This is expected as at the last stages of the fund’s life, new investments aren’t being made, and the fund is harvesting (exiting) the few remaining investments.  Because the remaining investments are typically small in value compared to the overall value of the fund, the TVPI multiple doesn’t change much at the end of the fund’s life.  This could change, though, if there are a few large investments that are held by the fund near the end of the fund’s life, and they either are written off (the fund suffers a large loss) or they are realized for much more than they were valued at by the fund.
 
Now let’s look at DPI.
Picture
​As the fund goes through its life, the fund exits its investments and makes distributions to the LPs.  Over time, more investments are exited and more distributions are made to the LPs.  At the end of the fund’s life, all investments are exited, and the fund makes a final distribution to LPs before the fund is liquidated.  At the end of the fund’s life, the DPI and TVPI will converge to the same multiple.
 
Finally, let’s take a look at Residual Value.
Picture
The above chart shows how residual value will fluctuate over time.  Residual value is a function of investment, valuation changes and distributions.  While residual value is an important metric, I don’t think this above graph adds much value.
 
What all this means…
Picture
A few take-aways:
  • Multiples will fluctuate over the life of a fund.  The multiples in early years, especially for venture capital, will likely not be indicative of the final multiples.  However, multiples after year 7 or 8 are more indicative of where the fund might end up.  In other words, multiples don’t mean much in the first few years of an early-stage venture capital fund’s life.
  • Interim vs final results.  Until a fund is wound-up and fully liquidated, the performance multiples provide interim, not final, results.  As a fund ages, the multiples tend to have less variability over time, but I’ve had fund hold on to investments for many years only to be sold for pennies on the dollar (compared to the valuation the fund was holding them at) late in a fund’s life.
  • Residual Value is largely an estimate.  Residual value is largely based on the estimated fair values of the underlying portfolio investments.  These estimates may be high or low, but are rarely exact.  Because of this, it is important to understand that the higher the Residual Value or RPI, the more variability the multiples may experience over time.
  • Fundraising and multiples.  Most funds start fundraising for their next fund every 2-3 years.  If you are trying to evaluate an existing fund’s performance based on year 3 metrics, the multiples don’t necessarily tell you the whole story.  You must really dig into the exits to date and the existing portfolio to really understand the potential of the fund.

Please help me improve this post by commenting.  Thanks.

 
© 2018 Allen J. Latta. All rights reserved.
9 Comments
LP Multiples
2/6/2018 02:07:31 pm

Hi Allen,

There's a typo under the "Simple Example" heading. It reads "Total Value here is $130 million ($70 RV + $70 D)."

I think the second $70 should be a $60 in order for the math to check out.

Really like the blog by the way.

Reply
Allen
2/27/2018 08:54:19 am

Thanks for catching the typo! The post has been corrected.

Reply
Scott
10/19/2018 08:51:50 am

If LP capital is used as a short-term bridge (close deal before co-investors come in), can you exclude this bridge from LP TVPI? It's rather punitive to be punished from a multiple perspective since the numerator and denominator impact is 1:1. Is there a standard industry practice on this?

Reply
Allen
11/17/2018 02:24:30 pm

Good question. If the LPA provides for Bridge Securities (these provisions typically say the Bridge Securities are not counted as a call), then the fund may present the TVPI, etc. without the impact of the Bridge Securities, but then should also show the TVPI with the impact of the Bridge Securities. The true "net to LP" returns include the impact of Bridge Securities. This is one of the reasons why the GP-reported performance may differ from the actual performance the LP calculates (another being the impact of distributed securities and how the value is calculated under the LPA).

Reply
Madhu
1/1/2019 02:08:22 pm

Very succinct and helpful post. Thank you!

Reply
mike
8/20/2019 05:31:37 am

Hi Allen,

Question: Under distributions, you state that "Funds typically make distributions to the LPs after it has exited an investment or two".

Would a Fund typically make distributions to its LPs during the investment period?

IFyes, why make distributions when the Fund is still calling down capital from the same LPs? Also, wouldn't the fund and the GP be penalizing their future potential carry by returning capital early when they could potentially make other investments?

What are your thoughts? Would be keen to hear your thoughts on this.

Thanks

Reply
Allen
9/9/2019 01:52:48 pm

Hi Mike, thanks for your comment. GPs will make distributions to LPs during the investment period because it improves net IRR. If the GP keeps cash on hand for future investments, this is a drag on the IRR. So it leads to the practice of GPs making distributions and then calling capital during a given period of time.

Reply
Aleema Seadath link
3/4/2020 03:32:38 am

I was just invited into joining a fund and this article succinctly explained the structure even a layman could understand. Thank you very much!

Reply
Vasiliki Ntina
6/3/2021 08:34:57 am

Really useful and easy to understand

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    About this Blog

    This Blog is a collection of thoughts on a variety of topics of interest to me, including:
    • Private Equity
    • Buyouts
    • Growth Equity
    • Venture Capital
    • Corporate Finance
    • Investment Banking
    • IPOs
    • M&A
    • Technology
    • Economics
    • Law
    I hope you find this blog of interest.
    View my profile on LinkedIn

    Categories

    All
    Anti-Dilution
    Berlin
    Board Of Directors
    Brazil
    Buyouts
    California
    China
    Cleantech
    Corporate Finance
    Corporate Venture Capital
    Crowdfunding
    Dilution
    Dividend Recap
    Economics
    Emerging Managers
    Endowments
    Entrepreneurship
    Europe
    Fund Terms
    General
    Growth Equity
    Healthcare
    India
    Innovation
    Investment Banking
    Ipo
    Israel
    Law
    Legal
    Libor
    Life Sciences
    Listed Private Equity
    London
    Los Angeles
    LP Corner
    M&A
    Mexico
    New York
    Pensions
    Politics
    Private Equity
    Public Stocks
    San Francisco
    Secondaries
    Secondary Exchanges
    Silicon Valley
    South America
    Speaking
    Stock Market
    Stock Options
    Tax
    Technology
    Travel
    United Kingdom
    Valuation
    Venture Capital
    Venture Capital Deal Terms
    Webinars


    Archives

    October 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011


    Copyright Notice:

    ​All original works on this site are 
    © 2011-2020 Allen J. Latta. All rights reserved.  Neither this website nor any portion thereof may be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever
    without the express prior written permission of Allen J. Latta.

    LP Corner® is a registered trademark of Campton Private Equity Advisors.  Used with permission.

    DISCLAIMER:  Readers of this Blog are not to construe it as investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, and it is not intended to provide the basis for the evaluation of any investment.  Readers should consult with their own investment, legal, accounting, tax and other advisors to the determine the benefits and risks of any investment.

    Private equity investments involve significant risks, including the loss of the entire investment.

    This Blog does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security.

Copyright © Allen J. Latta.  All rights reserved.