Allen Latta's Thoughts on Private Equity, Etc.
  • Allen's Blog
  • Blog Post Categories
  • Glossary of PE/VC Terms
  • Resources
  • About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimers

LP Corner: Fund Terms - Carried Interest Overview

6/30/2018

0 Comments

 
This is one of a series of posts on fund terms.  Other posts include:
  • Management Fee
  • GP Commitment
  • Carried Interest – Preferred Return and GP Catchup
  • GP Clawback ​
  • Management Fee Offsets
  • Key Person Clauses
  • No Fault Divorce
  • For Cause Actions
  • Should Venture Capital Funds have a Preferred Return Hurdle?

Carried Interest Overview
As discussed in my prior post on management fee, the long-standing fee model for private equity funds has been a “2 and 20” model, referring to a 2% management fee and a 20% carried interest.  But what is this “carried interest?” 
 
Read on!
 
Carried interest, also known as “carry,” “profit participation,” “promote” or the "distribution waterfall," is the share of the fund’s profit the fund’s manager (also known as “general partner” or “GP”) earns if the fund returns a profit to the fund’s investors (also known as “limited partners” or “LPs”).  See my prior post "LP Corner: US Private Equity Fund Structure - The Limited Partnership" for more detailed descriptions of LPs and the GP.
 
When a private equity fund calls capital from its LP investors (this is known as “paid-in-capital’ or “called capital” - see my prior post "LP Corner: On Committed Capital, Called Capital and Uncalled Capital" for further discussion of this topic), the GP manager of the fund will use that capital to make investments and to pay for fund expenses, such as management fee.  When the investments are realized, the amount in excess of the original investment amount is profit. 
 
The Two types of Carry: Whole Fund and Deal-by-Deal
There are two main types of carry: whole fund carry and deal-by-deal carry. 
 
To read more, please click on the "Read More" link below and to the right.
Whole Fund Carry.  Whole fund carry (also sometimes known as “European carry” as this type of carry was historically widely used by European funds) provides that the GP receives its carry after the LPs have received back all of their capital contributions (and, if applicable any preferred return – we will discuss preferred return in a later post).  Whole fund carry is LP friendly, whereas the deal-by-deal carry is GP friendly.
 
Deal-by-Deal Carry.  Deal-by-deal carry (also sometimes known as “American carry” as this type of carry was used by many American funds) provides that the GP participates in carry as investments (deals) are realized.  After a company is sold, if the investment was profitable, the GP will take its 20% carry on this profit.  If the deal wasn’t profitable, no carry is taken.  Practically speaking, this means the GP will earn carry earlier (and sometimes much earlier) in the life of a fund than whole fund carry.  It also means that a GP may (and often is) paid too much carry over the life of the fund, and the GP must repay to the fund the excess carry it was paid.  This is called a “GP clawback” and it will be discussed in a later blog post.
Picture
Example
Let’s use a simplified example to illustrate carry.  Assume our fund has $100 million of committed capital.  To make things easy, we are going to assume the fund has no management fee or expenses and has a 5 year life (these are unrealistic assumptions, but they make the example easier to understand).  We also assume that the fund has no preferred return provision (more on this later). 
 
In the first year of the fund, the LPs contribute the entire $100 million to the fund.  The fund uses this $100 million to make 3 investments, all in year 1.  See the table below:
Picture
The investment amounts are negative and in red because they represent cash outflows from the fund.  When the fund sells an investment and receives the money, that amount will appear as a positive number as it will be a cash inflow to the fund.
 
Let’s now assume that the fund sells Company 1 in year 2 for $60 million.  On this investment, the fund realizes a profit of $40 million ($60 million in realizations - $20 million investment).  Company 2 doesn’t do well and goes bankrupt in year 3 with the fund losing its entire investment.  The fund realizes a net loss of $30 million on its investment in Company 2.  Finally, assume that the fund sells Company 3 in year 5 for $60 million.  This means the fund realizes a profit of $10 million from its investment in Company 3 ($60 million realized - $50 million invested).

Looking at the cash flows, in year 1, the fund invested $100 million in three companies.  The fund received $60 million back when it sold Company 1 in year 2, representing a $40 million profit.  The fund lost $30 million when Company 2 went bankrupt in year 3.  The fund received $60 million in year 5 when it sold Company 3, for a profit of $10 million. 

Now let's look at how the GP will earn carry under each of the whole fund carry model and the deal-by-deal model.
 
Whole Fund Carry.  In our example, the LPs have contributed $100 million in capital.  Under whole fund carry, the GP is entitled to carry only after the LPs have received their contributed capital plus any preferred return (if any, and none is assumed in this example).  It is only in year 5 when the fund receives $60 million on the sale of Company 3 that the fund can return the contributed capital of $100 million back to the LPs.  In our example, over the five-year life of the fund, the fund invested $100 million and realized $120 million, representing a $20 million profit.  It is from this $20 million profit that the GP receives its 20% carry, which totals $4 million.  The GP receives its carry in year 5.  The LPs receive their $100 million in contributed capital back plus their share of the profits, which is $16 million.
 
Deal-by-Deal Carry.  In deal by deal carry, each transaction is looked at and carry is paid on the profits of each transaction.  In our example, the fund invested $20 million in Company 1 and in year 2 realized $60 million, for a profit of $40 million.  Under deal-by-deal carry, the GP is entitled to its 20% carry from this $40 million profit, for a total carry paid to the GP in year 2 of $8 million.  Compare this to whole fund carry – under whole fund carry the GP receives its carry in year 5, and receives total carry of $4 million.  Under deal-by-deal carry, the GP receives carry in year 2, and because its investment in Company 1 was very successful, the GP receives $8 million in carry.  We will see that ultimately the GP is only entitled to $4 million in carry, and so the GP has been overpaid carry and will have to return the excess to the fund.
 
Continuing our deal-by-deal carry example, Company 2 went bankrupt, so there’s no profit and no carry.  So after two deals, by year 3 the fund has invested $50 million and received back $60 million, for a total profit of $10 million.  This means that for these two deals the carry paid to the GP should be $2 million, but since the investment in Company 1 performed so well, the GP has received too much carry.  Company 3 is sold in year 5 for $60 million on a $50 million investment, for a profit of $10 million.  The GP is entitled to its 20% carry on the $10 million for $2 million.  So overall, the GP receives $10 million in carry under the deal-by-deal carry structure. 
 
But wait a minute.  The total profit of the fund is $20 million, and so the GPs share of the total profit is $4 million, not $10 million.  The GP has received too much carry in our example.  What happens when the GP is paid too much carry during the life of the fund is that the GP must return the excess carry to the fund.  This is known as a “GP clawback” as the excess carry is “clawed back” from the GP.  But there’s another problem – in year 2 when the GP received the $8 million in carry, each partner of the GP that received a share of the carry paid taxes on the amount of the carry, so if they then have to give the money back, they are typically only required to pay the carry back “net of taxes.”  This means that when a clawback occurs, the full amount of the over-payment is not paid back, and the LPs are effectively penalized. 
 
Additional Notes:
  • ​Hybrid Carry.  ​Some funds have used variations of the whole fund and deal-by-deal carry models to create what are known as "hybrid carry" models.  For example, one variation of a whole fund model might be that rather than being paid carry after all of the LP contributed capital is paid back, carry can be paid after 70% of the LP contributed capital is paid back.  This way, the GP will receive carry earlier in the life of the fund.  If the hybrid carry structures result in the GP receiving carry earlier than in the whole fund carry model, then the problem of overpaying carry to the GP exists.
  • Preferred Return Hurdle.  In a later post, we will discuss preferred return hurdles.  Essentially, a preferred return adds an additional threshold that the GP must achieve before it can be paid carry.  Preferred return hurdles are typically 8% per annum and are universal on buyout funds, common in growth funds, and less common in venture capital funds.
  • GP Catch-up.  This concept is tied to preferred return hurdle.  Once the GP has achieved the preferred return hurdle, it can either be paid on the next dollars of profit, or once the hurdle is met, the GP can be paid carry on all profit, whether above or below the hurdle.  This is called the GP catch up, because the GP is either paid all or substantially all of the future profits until it has "caught up" to its full 20% of the fund's profits.  This will be discussed in more detail in a later post.
  • GP Clawback.  If a GP is paid too much carry over the life of a fund, it will have to pay that excess carry back to the fund.  This usually occurs at the end of a fund's life, but can also occur earlier or upon certain defined events.  GP clawback will be discussed in more detail in a later post.
  • Premium Carry.  Some funds, notably premier venture capital funds, charge carry in excess of 20%.  Some funds charge carry at 25%, a very few charge carry at 30%.  Often, a premium carry is only achieved after some hurdle is met (such as a return of 3x of contributed capital), and then the carry is only obtained on the amount in excess of the hurdle.
  • Fee Options.  Some funds will offer LPs their choice of a fee/carry structure.  For example, a fund may offer LPs their choice of (1) management fee of 2% and carry of 20% (standard terms), or (2) management fee of 1% and carry of 30%.  By offering options, LPs are able to choose the fee structure that they believe will provide them with the best overall economics.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    About this Blog

    This Blog is a collection of thoughts on a variety of topics of interest to me, including:
    • Private Equity
    • Buyouts
    • Growth Equity
    • Venture Capital
    • Corporate Finance
    • Investment Banking
    • IPOs
    • M&A
    • Technology
    • Economics
    • Law
    I hope you find this blog of interest.
    View my profile on LinkedIn

    Categories

    All
    Anti-Dilution
    Berlin
    Board Of Directors
    Brazil
    Buyouts
    California
    China
    Cleantech
    Corporate Finance
    Corporate Venture Capital
    Crowdfunding
    Dilution
    Dividend Recap
    Economics
    Emerging Managers
    Endowments
    Entrepreneurship
    Europe
    Fund Terms
    General
    Growth Equity
    Healthcare
    India
    Innovation
    Investment Banking
    Ipo
    Israel
    Law
    Legal
    Libor
    Life Sciences
    Listed Private Equity
    London
    Los Angeles
    LP Corner
    M&A
    Mexico
    New York
    Pensions
    Politics
    Private Equity
    Public Stocks
    San Francisco
    Secondaries
    Secondary Exchanges
    Silicon Valley
    South America
    Speaking
    Stock Market
    Stock Options
    Tax
    Technology
    Travel
    United Kingdom
    Valuation
    Venture Capital
    Venture Capital Deal Terms
    Webinars


    Archives

    January 2024
    July 2023
    October 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011


    Copyright Notice:

    ​All original works on this site are 
    © Allen J. Latta. All rights reserved.  Neither this website nor any portion thereof may be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever without the express prior written permission of Allen J. Latta.

    LP Corner® is a registered trademark of Campton Private Equity Advisors.  Used with permission.

    DISCLAIMER:  Readers of this Blog are not to construe it as investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, and it is not intended to provide the basis for the evaluation of any investment.  Readers should consult with their own investment, legal, accounting, tax and other advisors to the determine the benefits and risks of any investment.

    Private equity investments involve significant risks, including the loss of the entire investment.

    This Blog does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security.

Copyright © Allen J. Latta.  All rights reserved.