Allen Latta's Thoughts on Private Equity, Etc.
  • Allen's Blog
  • Blog Post Categories
  • Glossary of Private Equity Terms
  • Resources
  • About
  • Contact

LP Corner: Fund Terms - Key Person Clause

7/28/2018

0 Comments

 
This is one of a series of posts on fund terms.  Other posts in this series include:
  • Management Fee
  • GP Commitment
  • Carried Interest Overview
  • Carried Interest – Preferred Return and GP Catchup
  • GP Clawback
  • Management Fee Offsets
  • No Fault Divorce
  • For Cause Actions
  • Should Venture Capital Funds have a Preferred Return Hurdle?

When an LP invests in a fund, it is because the LP believes that the investment team will successfully invest the fund.  But what happens if members of that investment team leave the firm in the midst of investing?  What happens if a key member of the team dies, or is convicted of securities fraud?  A “key person” clause (historically known as a “key man” clause) provides LPs with protections in case these events, and others, occur.

To read more, please click on the "Read More" link below and to the right.
​In general, a key person clause is triggered when one or more key persons are subject to “key person events.”  When this occurs, the fund’s new investment activities are typically suspended until the firm and the LPs can determine how to proceed, such as by appointing a new key person.  If the firm and the LPs can’t agree, then the new investment suspension becomes permanent, and the fund enters harvesting (aka realization) mode.  For more on the investment period and harvesting period, please see my post “LP Corner: The Four Phases in the Life of a Private Equity Fund.”
 
There are several aspects of a key person clause:
  • Who are the key persons?
  • What are the “key person events”?
  • What happens after a key person event occurs?
 
Who are the “key persons”?
Determining who are the “key persons” for the key-person clause is very important.  Sometimes it is very simple to determine who the key persons are; sometimes it is heavily negotiated.  In any case, the determination of who are the key persons is unique for each fund.
 
For example, if a firm is founded and managed by three partners, and all three of these partners make the investment decisions for the fund, then all three of those partners will likely be key persons.  For this fund, a key person clause may provide that two of the three key persons must remain involved with the fund at all times.
 
In some cases, there are two levels of key persons: a senior level and a junior level.  For example, a firm has eight investing partners, three of whom are senior partners and five of whom are junior partners.  A key person clause might provide that at least two of the three senior partners and three of the five junior partners must be active in the fund’s affairs at all times.
 
What are the key person events?
The terminology is usually that the key persons must devote substantially all of their business time and efforts to the activities of the fund, with certain carve-outs (serving on public boards, charitable activities, etc.).  Practically speaking, certain events will prevent a key person from devoting “substantially all of their business time to the activities of the fund” such as death, permanent disability or termination of employment (a key person quits or is fired).  The limited partnership agreement ("LPA") may also provide that other specific events relating to a key person may be deemed to be not devoting substantially all of their business time and effort to the fund, such as fraud, material breach of the LPA, securities laws violations, etc.
 
What happens after a key person event occurs?
Once a key person clause has been triggered, generally the fund’s investment period is automatically suspended for a period of time (usually 180 days), which leads to permanent suspension of the investment period unless a majority in interest (see the Notes below for a discussion of this) or some super-majority in interest (see the Notes below for a discussion of this) of the LPs votes to reinstate the investment period.  The idea is to give the GP some time to present a plan to the LPs to continue the fund’s investment strategy, such as by replacing the departed key persons.  If the LPs approve the plan, then the investment period is reinstated; if they don’t, then the suspension of the investment period becomes permanent, and the fund effectively enters into realization mode.  Note that sometimes it is the Limited Partner Advisory Committee that will vote on reinstating the investment period instead of a majority in interest of the LPs. 
 
Note that the suspension of the investment period only applies to new investments – no new investments may be made while the investment period is suspended.  However, the fund can continue to make follow-on investments in existing portfolio companies. 
 
One issue is what happens to management fee during this period.  In most cases, management fee is unaffected by the triggering of a key person event.  The LPs continue to pay management fee to the fund.
 
Example:
Super Duper Capital II, a lower middle-market buyout firm, has three senior partners, Amy, Bill and Cathy, and five junior partners, Mark, Natalie, Owen, Paul and Robin.  The fund has a five-year investment period.  The LPA provides that two of the three senior partners and three of the five junior partners must devote substantially all of their business time to the fund’s activities, and if that ceases to be the case, then the investment period is automatically suspended for a period of 180 days, provided that a majority-in-interest of LPs can vote to reinstate the investment period during such 180-day period.  If the required LP vote is not obtained during the 180-day period, then the suspension of the investment period becomes permanent.
 
During the second year of the investment period, Amy, Bill and Natalie leave to start a new firm.  In this case the key person clause is triggered, and the investment period is suspended.  Three months later, the GP has identified replacement partners, and makes a proposal to the LPs regarding hiring these individuals.  The LPs are satisfied, and they vote to reinstate the investment period.

Additional Notes:
  • Other Actions on Trigger.  Less commonly, when a triggering event occurs the LPs may be able to vote to dissolve the fund or to replace the GP.
  • Devoting sufficient time.  The requirement stated above was that a key person had to devote "substantially all of their business time and efforts" to the activities of the fund.  Another version of this is that the key person had to devote "sufficient time" to the fund.  Both of these phrases are subjective in nature and can lead to disagreements of whether the standard is being met.
  • Majority-in-interest.  LPs in a fund don't commit the same amount in the fund.  In a mega-buyout fund, a very large sovereign wealth fund or public pension fund may commit $100 million or more to the fund, while other investors commit $50 million, or $25 million or $10 million or $5 million.  A "majority in interest" means those LPs whose commitments total in excess of 50% of the total capital commitments in the fund.  For example, in a $1 billion fund, a vote by a majority in interest in the fund means that LPs representing $500,000,001 in capital commitments.
  • Super-majority in interest.   A super-majority in interest means those LPs representing committed capital in excess of a certain threshold in interest.  Super-majority thresholds can be 60%, 2/3, 75% or 80%.  For example, a reinstatement of the investment period could require a vote of 2/3 in interest of the LPs in a fund.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    About this Blog

    This Blog is a collection of thoughts on a variety of topics of interest to me, including:
    • Private Equity
    • Buyouts
    • Growth Equity
    • Venture Capital
    • Corporate Finance
    • Investment Banking
    • IPOs
    • M&A
    • Technology
    • Economics
    • Law
    I hope you find this blog of interest.
    View my profile on LinkedIn

    Categories

    All
    Anti-Dilution
    Berlin
    Board Of Directors
    Brazil
    Buyouts
    California
    China
    Cleantech
    Corporate Finance
    Corporate Venture Capital
    Crowdfunding
    Dilution
    Dividend Recap
    Economics
    Emerging Managers
    Endowments
    Entrepreneurship
    Europe
    Fund Terms
    General
    Growth Equity
    Healthcare
    India
    Innovation
    Investment Banking
    Ipo
    Israel
    Law
    Legal
    Libor
    Life Sciences
    Listed Private Equity
    London
    Los Angeles
    LP Corner
    M&A
    Mexico
    New York
    Pensions
    Politics
    Private Equity
    Public Stocks
    San Francisco
    Secondaries
    Secondary Exchanges
    Silicon Valley
    South America
    Speaking
    Stock Market
    Stock Options
    Tax
    Technology
    Travel
    United Kingdom
    Valuation
    Venture Capital
    Venture Capital Deal Terms
    Webinars


    Archives

    October 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011


    Copyright Notice:

    ​All original works on this site are 
    © 2011-2020 Allen J. Latta. All rights reserved.  Neither this website nor any portion thereof may be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever
    without the express prior written permission of Allen J. Latta.

    LP Corner® is a registered trademark of Campton Private Equity Advisors.  Used with permission.

    DISCLAIMER:  Readers of this Blog are not to construe it as investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, and it is not intended to provide the basis for the evaluation of any investment.  Readers should consult with their own investment, legal, accounting, tax and other advisors to the determine the benefits and risks of any investment.

    Private equity investments involve significant risks, including the loss of the entire investment.

    This Blog does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security.

Copyright © Allen J. Latta.  All rights reserved.
Securities offered through LightPath Capital, Inc., Member FINRA/SIPC.
LightPath Capital, Inc., ​1560 E. Southlake Blvd, Suite 100, Southlake, TX 76092.  Phone: 214-481-7641