Allen Latta's Thoughts on Private Equity, Etc.
  • Allen's Blog
  • Blog Post Categories
  • Glossary of Private Equity Terms
  • Resources
  • About
  • Contact

Venture Capital Financings: Understanding the Liquidation Preference

1/4/2021

0 Comments

 
​In a convertible preferred stock financing, one of the most heavily negotiated terms is the liquidation preference. 
 
A liquidation preference is a priority payment right given to preferred stockholders when a company has a “liquidation” event – which means a sale of the company or the bankruptcy/winding down of the company.  In the event of a liquidation, the liquidation preference determines how the liquidation proceeds are prioritized and paid to the preferred stockholders and the common stockholders.  These payments are called a “liquidation waterfall.”
 
Liquidation preferences can be pretty complex, so let’s break this down into components.
What is a “liquidation?”
A “liquidation” for purposes of these liquidation preferences fall into two categories:
  • Business Failure.  If a company fails, it goes through a legal procedure called dissolution.  During a dissolution, the assets of the company are typically sold and the cash in the company is first paid to the company’s creditors and then if any cash is left over (often there is nothing left), the cash is paid to the preferred stockholders in accordance with the liquidation preference, and then if there is any cash remaining after the preferred stockholders are paid, then the common stockholders receive the remaining cash.  Generally speaking, if an early-stage company fails, there’s very little to divide up among the preferred stockholders and the common stockholders.
  • Sale or Merger of the Company.  If a company is sold to or merges with another company, the proceeds from this sale or merger are subject to the liquidation preferences.  A company sale includes the following transactions:
    • Stock for cash.  The acquiror (which an be a company or a private equity fund) pays cash for all of the target company’s outstanding stock.
    • Stock for stock.  The acquiror (in this case usually a publicly-traded company) purchases the stock of the target company in exchange for publicly-traded stock of the acquiror.
    • Assets for cash.  The acquiror buys substantially all of the target’s stock in exchange for cash.
    • Assets for stock.  This isn’t very common, but in this case the acquiror buys substantially all of the target’s assets in exchange for stock.
    • Merger.  This is a very common structure where the acquiror (or a subsidiary set up specifically for this purpose) merges with the target.
For more information on mergers and acquisitions, see the post “LP Corner: What an LP Needs to Know about Portfolio Company Mergers and Acquisitions.”
 
The main thing to know here is that a liquidation includes a sale of the company.
 
Option 1: Basic Liquidation Preference
The most basic form of liquidation preference is that the preferred stock holders receive their money back (or a multiple of their money back) before the common stockholders receive any payment.  The multiple preference can be 1.0x (meaning the preferred stockholders receive their money back), 1.5x or 2x or even 3x, so that the preferred stock would receive the multiple of their money back before the common stockholders receive any payment.
 
Multiple Example.  Assume LattaWare sells 1 million shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock to Hungry VC at $1.00 per share, for a total investment of $1 million.  The founders of LattaWare own 1 million shares of common stock.  LattaWare’s (very simplified) capitalization table (“cap table”) is as follows:
 
Picture

​​A quick note on the cap table.  Because the preferred stock is convertible, initially at a 1:1 ratio, the above cap table shows the “Common Stock Equivalents” to show what the ownership would be if the Series A Preferred stockholders were to convert their shares.
 
As part of the negotiations, Hungry VC negotiates a 2x liquidation preference.  LattaWare is sold 7 years later for $3 million.  Since a sale of the company is a “liquidation”, Hungry VC will receive its 2x liquidation preference of $2 million ($1 million investment * 2x liquidation preference) before the common stockholders receive the remaining $1 million.
Picture
​Note that it isn’t very common for early-stage investors to receive a multiple liquidation preference, but it does happen.
 
Dividends.  Another consideration is dividends.  Liquidation preferences negotiated by preferred stockholders typically include the payment of any accrued and unpaid dividends.  If a preferred stockholder negotiates a cumulative dividend provision as part of the preferred stock financing, and the company has not paid any dividends, then in a liquidation, the preferred stockholders would receive the accrued and unpaid dividends as part of the liquidation preference.  For more on dividends, please see the post “Preferred Stock Financings: Understanding Dividends.”
 
Dividend Example.  Assume the same LattaWare example above, except that Hungry VC also negotiated an 8% cumulative dividend in addition to the 2x liquidation preference, and the company was sold at the end of year 7.  In this case, after the company was sold for $3 million, Hungry VC would receive $2.56 million ($2 million plus the accrued but unpaid dividends of $560,000 (8% * $1 million * 7 years).  After Hungry receives its $2.56 million, there’s $440,000 left for the common stockholders.

Picture
​Option 2: Participating Preferred
Another option is that after the preferred stock is paid its liquidation preference, it then participates in the remaining pool of money with the common stockholders.  This is known as “participating preferred stock.”  The way this works is that after the liquidation preference is paid to the preferred stockholders, the remaining pool of money is shared among the common stockholders and preferred stockholders.  The calculation of how much is based on a the number of shares owned by the common stockholders and the number of common shares the preferred stockholders would own if their preferred stock was converted into common stock (known as “as converted” basis.
 
Participating Example.  Using the same LattaWare example from above, assume the common stockholders owned 1 million shares.  As before, Hungry VC invested $1 million in exchange for 1 million shares of preferred stock (convertible into common on a 1:1 basis), and obtained a 2x liquidation preference plus an 8% cumulative dividend.  Now, in addition, assume Hungry VC negotiated participating preferred rights, so it shares in the money that is paid to the common stockholders.  Here, Hungry VC would receive a total of $2.78 million and the common stockholders would receive $220,000. 

Picture

​Hungry VC’s payment has 3 components: (1) $2 million from the 2x preference; (2) $560,000 from the accrued and unpaid dividends; and (3) $220,000 from participating in the monies paid to the common stockholders.  The $220,000 is calculated as follows:  there’s $440,000 remaining after paying Hungry VC the 2x preference and accrued but unpaid dividends.  From the cap table above, we know that the founders own 1 million shares of common stock, and the preferred stockholders own 1 million shares of common on an “as converted basis” (1 million shares of preferred stock converting on a 1:1 basis).  For more on converting preferred stock into common stock, see the post “Convertible Preferred Stock: Understanding the Conversion Feature.”
 
Option 2: Capped Amount
Another option is to cap the amount that the preferred stockholders can receive in a liquidation.  The purpose of this is to ensure that the common stockholders don’t get completely squeezed out from receiving proceeds from the sale of the company because of the preferred stock liquidation preferences.
 
The way this works is that the preferred stock would have participating preferred and the total amount the preferred could receive is capped at some total amount.
 
Cap Example.  Continuing with the same example as above, except that the preferred stockholders have a cap of 20x of their investment, and the company is now sold for $100 million dollars.  If there’s no cap, the preferred stockholders receive $51,280,000 and the founders receive $48,720,000.  With a 20X cap, the preferred stockholders receive $20 million and the founders receive $80 million.

 
How Founders Can Start a Successful Company but Get Nothing When it is Sold
There has been the occasional story about how founders get nothing when their company is sold.  How can this happen?  It all depends on the liquidation preferences.  Let’s use our LattaWare example.  Same as above, except that Hungry VC negotiates a 5x liquidation preference and the company is sold for $5 million after one year.  In this case, Hungry VC would receive all $5 million of the proceeds because of the liquidation preference and the founders would be shut out completely.
 
This is why it’s really important for entrepreneurs to have financial and legal counsel to guide them through financing rounds.  Entrepreneurs need to understand the effects of ownership dilution as well as the nuances of preferred stock financing terms.
 
 
 
© Allen J. Latta. All rights reserved.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    About this Blog

    This Blog is a collection of thoughts on a variety of topics of interest to me, including:
    • Private Equity
    • Buyouts
    • Growth Equity
    • Venture Capital
    • Corporate Finance
    • Investment Banking
    • IPOs
    • M&A
    • Technology
    • Economics
    • Law
    I hope you find this blog of interest.
    View my profile on LinkedIn

    Categories

    All
    Anti-Dilution
    Berlin
    Board Of Directors
    Brazil
    Buyouts
    California
    China
    Cleantech
    Corporate Finance
    Corporate Venture Capital
    Crowdfunding
    Dilution
    Dividend Recap
    Economics
    Emerging Managers
    Endowments
    Entrepreneurship
    Europe
    Fund Terms
    General
    Growth Equity
    Healthcare
    India
    Innovation
    Investment Banking
    Ipo
    Israel
    Law
    Legal
    Libor
    Life Sciences
    Listed Private Equity
    London
    Los Angeles
    LP Corner
    M&A
    Mexico
    New York
    Pensions
    Politics
    Private Equity
    Public Stocks
    San Francisco
    Secondaries
    Secondary Exchanges
    Silicon Valley
    South America
    Speaking
    Stock Market
    Stock Options
    Tax
    Technology
    Travel
    United Kingdom
    Valuation
    Venture Capital
    Venture Capital Deal Terms
    Webinars


    Archives

    October 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011


    Copyright Notice:

    ​All original works on this site are 
    © 2011-2020 Allen J. Latta. All rights reserved.  Neither this website nor any portion thereof may be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever
    without the express prior written permission of Allen J. Latta.

    LP Corner® is a registered trademark of Campton Private Equity Advisors.  Used with permission.

    DISCLAIMER:  Readers of this Blog are not to construe it as investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, and it is not intended to provide the basis for the evaluation of any investment.  Readers should consult with their own investment, legal, accounting, tax and other advisors to the determine the benefits and risks of any investment.

    Private equity investments involve significant risks, including the loss of the entire investment.

    This Blog does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security.

Copyright © Allen J. Latta.  All rights reserved.