Allen Latta's Thoughts on Private Equity, Etc.
  • Allen's Blog
  • Blog Post Categories
  • Glossary of Private Equity Terms
  • Resources
  • About
  • Contact

What is a Successful IPO? - Updated

6/11/2012

0 Comments

 
Update:  After some feedback on my original post on May 21, 2012, I've amended it to add a separate section for pre-IPO investors and to update it for recent events.

Facebook's IPO has been branded a failure by virtually everyone.  However, there have been a few articles declaring the IPO a success.  All of this begs a larger question:  What is a Successful IPO?

My answer to this question is that it depends on perspective: that of the company; pre-IPO investors; the underwriting syndicate; the institutional IPO buyer; and retail investors buying the stock on its first day of trading.  Let's look at these perspectives and use Facebook's IPO as an example.

The Company's Perspective.  In my experience as a former investment banker working on IPOs, a company wants a few things in an IPO: (1) to raise the capital that it needs (and/or to facilitate existing shareholders selling in the IPO); (2) a favorable valuation; (3) to minimize IPO fees and expenses if it can; (4) seeing the stock perform well in the aftermarket; and (5) the media reporting favorably on the IPO.  Let's look at #4.  Why does a company want its stock to perform well in the aftermarket?  The primary reason is that the wealth of existing shareholders (including founders) and employees who hold stock options depends on the stock price.  Once an IPO prices, the stock price becomes a benchmark for founders and employees (and pre-IPO investors and the investing public at large).  If the stock price goes up post-IPO, shareholder and option-holder value increases, which is the goal.  If the stock price dips below the IPO price, there will be disappointment, especially among employees who hold stock options.  Another reason is that a strong stock is helpful as an acquisition currency.  A rising stock price is an attractive currency to targets.  

In my view, how the company's stock price performs over the next 180+ days also matters.  At 180 days after the IPO, selling restrictions for most pre-IPO shareholders will expire (this 180 day period is known as the "IPO lock-up period").  Markets take note of lock-up expirations.  Also, at 180 days after the IPO, a company will have reported its first quarterly results as a public company.  It's after this lock-up period that all IPO restrictions expire and shareholders can begin to sell their shares to the public (via Rule 144 sales).

So from Facebook's perspective, is the IPO a success?  In three of the above five metrics, yes, but in two important metrics, a resounding no.  Facebook raised significant capital (nearly $6.8 billion for the company and over $9 billion for selling shareholders).  Favorable valuation?  At an IPO market cap of over $81 billion, I'd say so (even though the market cap has dropped post-IPO, it's still impressive).  The company paid 1.1% in underwriting fees, which is well below the 7% customary for most technology IPOs, and also lower than many of the larger IPOs (by comparison, Visa's underwriters earned commissions of 2.8% in a $17 billion IPO; Groupon's underwriters earned commissions of 6%).  Based on the fourth metric, post-IPO performance, Facebook's IPO has been a failure in my view.  In addition to the drop in the stock price, Facebook has granted certain shareholders a very short 90 day lock-up period, so the market may be flooded with additional stock 90 days after the IPO date, which could drive the stock price down even further.  Finally, for media coverage, the pre-IPO the media coverage was generally favorable, but coverage post-IPO has been overwhelmingly negative - overall I'd say this was a failure as well.  So from Facebook's perspective, the IPO was mixed - partly successful and partly unsuccessful.

Pre-IPO Investor Perspective. Investors in a private, pre-IPO company are typically friends and family, angel investors and venture capital fund investors.  From their perspective, a successful IPO is typically is one where they are able to obtain a significant return on their investment either as a selling shareholder in the IPO, or a selling shareholder after the IPO (typically in a subsequent public offering or through Rule 144 sales when all lock-up restrictions expire).

From the pre-IPO investor perspective, was the IPO a success?  For the investors that were selling shareholders at the IPO, the IPO was a stunning success.  This includes venture capital firms Accel Partners, Greylock Partners, Meritech Capital Partners, among others, and angel investor Peter Thiel.  These pre-IPO investors invested in Facebook's early stage financings and sold their shares in the IPO for significant returns.  For the pre-IPO investors that will be selling shareholders at some point in the future, the answer is it depends on the price at which they ultimately sell their shares (and, of course the price at which they acquired their shares from Facebook).

The Underwriting Syndicate's Perspective.  It's not just about fees - it's also about reputation: reputation with future IPO clients, with institutional IPO investors; and with the investment community in general.  Attracting IPO clients is largely about league tables (e.g., which bank has the most "left lead" underwriter roles for that sector and in general), IPO performance (how the bank managed the IPO and how the stock performed post-IPO), and equity research (analyst reputation and coverage).  Importantly, banks will work hard to ensure that the stock price stays above the IPO price.  If the stock price falls below the IPO price, the IPO is considered "broken" and it is a black eye for the bank.  Banks engage in post-IPO market price stabilization to keep the stock price at or above the IPO price.  Reputation with institutional IPO investors is also important to future IPO performance - if institutional investors won't buy IPOs from a bank over valuation and aftermarket performance concerns, the bank's reputation will ultimately take a hit.  It is for this reason that banks build in an IPO discount when selling to institutional investors.  Partly as a result of this discount, there is usually an IPO "pop" of about 10-15% from the IPO price to the first trade.  If this pop doesn't occur, then the bank may have a harder time selling the next deal to institutional investors.

So from the underwriters' perspective, was the Facebook IPO a success?  I'd have to say a resounding No.  Note that the syndicate did earn $176 million from the deal in fees and commissions.  The stock even had an 11% pop at first trade.  But the stock price dropped and "broke" the IPO price.  This is a huge black eye for Morgan Stanley, the "left lead" bank on the IPO.  In addition, as the stock price broke the IPO price the over-allotment option will not be exercised, so the banks will miss out on the additional fees the sale of these shares would have generated.  The media has been highly negative on the IPO.  Overall, my perception is that the IPO was a big failure for the underwriting syndicate.

Institutional IPO Buyer's Perspective.   Institutional buyers are typically long-term investors and so the stock price one day or one month after the IPO may ultimately not be that important.  But as discussed above, many have an expectation that they are buying the IPO shares at a discount to what the true valuation is, and given that they do expect the stock to trade up after the IPO.

From the Institutional IPO buyer's perspective, the Facebook IPO is currently looking like a big failure.  However, as institutional buyers are typically long-term investors, how the stock trades over the long term is what is key.  So the ultimate result will depend on where Facebook's stock trades in the long term.

Retail IPO Buyer's Perspective.  Retail investors buying IPOs in the after-market are taking big risks, and it looks like most were burned in the Facebook IPO.  In the first day of trading, Facebook opened at $42.05 (an IPO pop of almost 11%) and closed at $38.23.  If a retail buyer purchased at $42.05 and sold at $38.23, that's a 9% loss.  The stock price has dropped steadily since then, and so those retail investors who purchased at the IPO opening price are feeling lots of pain.

A Note on the Media.  The media helps shape public opinion and so is an important part of the IPO process.  From the media's perspective, a juicy headline sells papers (well today it sells online advertising...).  So if the IPO is a big winner or big loser, the media wins.  With Facebook, the pre-IPO reporting was generally favorable, but  the media had a field day with the IPO under-performing in its first day of trading and the fall afterwards.  From the media's perspective, the Facebook IPO was a huge success.

Additional Notes.  The above thoughts represent my developing thesis on the topic.  Any constructive feedback would be welcomed to help me further develop my views.  I don't own any Facebook stock. 
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    About this Blog

    This Blog is a collection of thoughts on a variety of topics of interest to me, including:
    • Private Equity
    • Buyouts
    • Growth Equity
    • Venture Capital
    • Corporate Finance
    • Investment Banking
    • IPOs
    • M&A
    • Technology
    • Economics
    • Law
    I hope you find this blog of interest.
    View my profile on LinkedIn

    Categories

    All
    Anti-Dilution
    Berlin
    Board Of Directors
    Brazil
    Buyouts
    California
    China
    Cleantech
    Corporate Finance
    Corporate Venture Capital
    Crowdfunding
    Dilution
    Dividend Recap
    Economics
    Emerging Managers
    Endowments
    Entrepreneurship
    Europe
    Fund Terms
    General
    Growth Equity
    Healthcare
    India
    Innovation
    Investment Banking
    Ipo
    Israel
    Law
    Legal
    Libor
    Life Sciences
    Listed Private Equity
    London
    Los Angeles
    LP Corner
    M&A
    Mexico
    New York
    Pensions
    Politics
    Private Equity
    Public Stocks
    San Francisco
    Secondaries
    Secondary Exchanges
    Silicon Valley
    South America
    Speaking
    Stock Market
    Stock Options
    Tax
    Technology
    Travel
    United Kingdom
    Valuation
    Venture Capital
    Venture Capital Deal Terms
    Webinars


    Archives

    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011


    Copyright Notice:

    ​All original works on this site are 
    © 2011-2020 Allen J. Latta. All rights reserved.  Neither this website nor any portion thereof may be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever
    without the express prior written permission of Allen J. Latta.

    LP Corner® is a registered trademark of Campton Private Equity Advisors.  Used with permission.

    DISCLAIMER:  Readers of this Blog are not to construe it as investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, and it is not intended to provide the basis for the evaluation of any investment.  Readers should consult with their own investment, legal, accounting, tax and other advisors to the determine the benefits and risks of any investment.

    Private equity investments involve significant risks, including the loss of the entire investment.

    This Blog does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security.

Copyright © Allen J. Latta.  All rights reserved.
Securities offered through LightPath Capital, Inc., Member FINRA/SIPC.
LightPath Capital, Inc., ​1560 E. Southlake Blvd, Suite 100, Southlake, TX 76092.  Phone: 214-481-7641