Allen Latta's Thoughts on Private Equity, Etc.
  • Allen's Blog
  • Blog Post Categories
  • Glossary of PE/VC Terms
  • Resources
  • About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimers

LP Corner: Understanding the Capital Call Model and the Impact of Cash Drag

12/4/2018

0 Comments

 
Why is it that mutual funds take an investor’s capital on day 1, while PE funds take an investor’s capital over time?  That’s the topic of this post.

When an investor makes an investment in a mutual fund, the investor invests the entire amount of the investment on day 1.  The mutual fund manager will quickly use this money to increase existing positions in the fund or make new investments.  It’s easy for the mutual fund manager to put the money to work by buying publicly-traded securities.
 
Investments in private equity funds are different.  Private equity funds operate on a “called capital” model.  By way of background, when an investor (known as a “limited partner” or “LP”) makes a legal commitment to a private equity fund, the LP commits to providing the fund with a certain maximum investment amount, which is known as the “LP commitment.”  For example, if an LP agrees to invest a total of $10 million in a private equity fund, that $10 million is the LP commitment.  For more background, please see the following posts:
  • LP Corner: On Committed Capital, Called Capital and Uncalled Capital
  • LP Corner: US Private Equity Fund Structure – The Limited Partnership
 
​To read more, please click “Read More” below.
​When a private equity fund needs some capital, it will request (“call”) the capital from the LPs.  This call can be for any amount of money, up to the maximum amount of the LPs total commitment.  When a PE fund makes a call, it will send its LPs what is known as a “capital call notice”.  The Institutional Limited Partners Association (ILPA) has a template for capital calls that can be found here: https://ilpa.org/capital-call-distribution-quarterly-reporting/.
 
Example.  Let’s say that ABC Fund has received $100 million in total LP commitments and that XYZ Foundation has committed $5 million to the fund.  XYZ’s total capital commitment is $5 million.  At the closing of the fund, ABC Fund calls 10% of the total commitment from each LP (called a “10% capital call”).  As XYZ Foundation has committed $5 million to the fund, the 10% capital call means that XYZ Foundation must wire transfer $500,000 to ABC Fund within the time prescribed by the limited partnership agreement (capital calls are usually required to be made on 10 business days’ notice).  Assuming all LPs honor the capital call notice, then ABC Fund will receive a total of $10 million from all of its LPs.
 
So back to the question: Why does a private equity fund call capital over time instead of taking all of the capital up front on day 1 like a mutual fund?
 
The simple answer is that private equity firms and funds are sized and structured so that the investment team will identify and make investments over an “investment period” that usually lasts 5 years.  The investment team is constantly sourcing, evaluating and making investments.  This process occurs over the entire investment period.  This means the fund doesn’t need all of the capital up front, and so the fund only calls capital when it needs it, such as when it is ready to make an investment, or to pay management fees or fund expenses.  This is why private equity funds call capital over time.
 
Cash Drag
But there’s another side to this, and it is known as “cash drag.”  Cash drag is the negative impact on a fund’s performance that is caused by having too much cash on the fund’s balance sheet.
 
Example.  To understand this, let’s continue to use our example.  ABC Fund has capital commitments of $100 million.  To make this example easy, we will assume that ABC Fund has no management fee or carry and makes four investments of $25 million each in one-year intervals.  Also assume that at the end of year 5 the fund sells all of its investments for $300 million and returns all of this $300 million to the limited partners.
 
Assuming the fund calls the capital when it makes each investment, the cash flows to/from the LPs would be as follows: 
Picture
(Note that for Excel, time = 0 means day 1 of the fund; time = 1 means the end of the year 1; year 2 means the end of year 2; etc.)
 
Based on the above cash flows, the IRR for the fund is 35%.  Because the fund called the capital only when it needed it, there is no cash drag.
 
Now what if the fund called all of the capital on day 1 and kept it on its balance sheet until it needed the money for each investment.  The cash flows to/from the LPs would look like this:
Picture
Based on the above, the IRR for the fund is 25%.  The cash drag cost the fund a whopping 10% of performance.  This illustrates the point: If a fund takes all the cash up front, but doesn’t deploy it immediately, the drag this cash will have on the fund’s performance can be substantial.
 
LP Burden
The called capital model results in an investment cost to the LP and also creates an administrative burden for the LP.  Because the timing of the fund’s capital calls is uncertain and the calls are due on short notice (usually 10 business days), LPs must maintain sufficient liquidity to be able to meet these capital calls.  This means that the LP must hold capital to meet near-term anticipated capital calls in investments that have higher liquidity.  However, these more liquid investments typically provide lower expected returns than those for private equity funds.  Because of this, some LPs may include the impact of these lower-yielding investments with the performance of the private equity funds when evaluating the overall performance of their private equity program.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    About this Blog

    This Blog is a collection of thoughts on a variety of topics of interest to me, including:
    • Private Equity
    • Buyouts
    • Growth Equity
    • Venture Capital
    • Corporate Finance
    • Investment Banking
    • IPOs
    • M&A
    • Technology
    • Economics
    • Law
    I hope you find this blog of interest.
    View my profile on LinkedIn

    Categories

    All
    Anti-Dilution
    Berlin
    Board Of Directors
    Brazil
    Buyouts
    California
    China
    Cleantech
    Corporate Finance
    Corporate Venture Capital
    Crowdfunding
    Dilution
    Dividend Recap
    Economics
    Emerging Managers
    Endowments
    Entrepreneurship
    Europe
    Fund Terms
    General
    Growth Equity
    Healthcare
    India
    Innovation
    Investment Banking
    Ipo
    Israel
    Law
    Legal
    Libor
    Life Sciences
    Listed Private Equity
    London
    Los Angeles
    LP Corner
    M&A
    Mexico
    New York
    Pensions
    Politics
    Private Equity
    Public Stocks
    San Francisco
    Secondaries
    Secondary Exchanges
    Silicon Valley
    South America
    Speaking
    Stock Market
    Stock Options
    Tax
    Technology
    Travel
    United Kingdom
    Valuation
    Venture Capital
    Venture Capital Deal Terms
    Webinars


    Archives

    June 2026
    April 2025
    October 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    February 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011


    Copyright Notice:

    ​All original works on this site are 
    © Allen J. Latta. All rights reserved.  Neither this website nor any portion thereof may be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever without the express prior written permission of Allen J. Latta.

    LP Corner® is a registered trademark of Campton Private Equity Advisors.  Used with permission.

    DISCLAIMER:  Readers of this Blog are not to construe it as investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, and it is not intended to provide the basis for the evaluation of any investment.  Readers should consult with their own investment, legal, accounting, tax and other advisors to the determine the benefits and risks of any investment.

    Private equity investments involve significant risks, including the loss of the entire investment.

    This Blog does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security.

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.